Contact & corrections
COMPARISON
Regulators compared
The same failing can lead to very different outcomes depending on who regulates it. This table compares the main bodies we track: what they can do, how they publish it and what the published record shows.
| Body | Jurisdiction | Main sanctions | Where decisions appear | Published record we track |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gambling Commission | Great Britain | Settlements, financial penalties, warnings, licence conditions, suspension, revocation | Public register of regulatory actions; enforcement news | £41.5m, 84 cases, 2024 to Oct 2026 |
| Advertising Standards Authority | United Kingdom | Rulings requiring ads to be withdrawn; publicity; referral (no fines) | Rulings on asa.org.uk | 31 rulings, 23 upheld, 2025 to Oct 2026 |
| AGCO | Ontario | Monetary penalties, conditions, suspension or revocation of registration | News releases | 15 penalties, C$1.42m, 2023 to Oct 2026 |
| AGLC | Alberta | Registration and enforcement under Alberta's new framework | No published iGaming penalties yet | Market opened 13 July 2026 |
| NJ Division of Gaming Enforcement | New Jersey | Civil penalties, disgorgement, conditions | Director's actions (twice-monthly PDFs) | 23 actions, $1.05m |
| Massachusetts Gaming Commission | Massachusetts | Civil administrative penalties, Commission fines | Noncompliance table | 24 actions, $745,500 |
| Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board | Pennsylvania | Consent agreements with fines | Press releases; monthly fines list | 5 online actions, $490,905 |
For what these bodies fine operators for, see our cross-market analysis. For each regulator's rules and registers, use the source directory.
Seen a newer notice or ruling?
Regulators publish enforcement decisions every month. Send us the link and we will check it against the source.